... seeking simple answers to complex problems, and in the process, disrupting the status quo in technology, art and neuroscience.

Monday, November 12, 2018

The Nature of Knowledge


I realize the ambitious objective indicated by the title, but there's another perspective - the essence of knowledge, which is more limited in scope and can be more easily contained. And explained.

What does it mean to know something? Is it to have that thing well characterized? To understand what might happen to it in most circumstances? To have access to the truth about a thing? I believe this last description goes beyond the scope of knowledge, and in doing so causes a great deal of confusion and grief.

If you've read my blog post on, "Absolutely", you'll remember my description of approaching truth asymptotically, but never achieving it. Knowledge is that approach, ever waiting to be refined and edited.

Think about a few things that you "know" to be true. Are they really? Politics is a fertile field for knowledge. Half of any group will "know" things the other half dismisses. It's the same with religion. Conviction is none the less certain from multiple conflicting perspectives. See what I mean? Half of what we "know" does not even approach the truth. And the other half is only a useful generalization.

The point is, what we "know" at any given instant is simply the best understanding available to us at the time, based on our own individual experience and perception. This may often be a long way from the truth. It's also why it's best to keep an opened mind.

Knowledge is a work in progress. To know something is only to approach its truth, and sometimes to fall well short. Yet we act on our knowledge because it's the best we have to work with at the moment.

Just be prepared to learn something new in your never-ending quest for knowledge.